Archive for the “Movies” Category So, I finally saw Iron Man the other day. Yes, it took me six months to see it. I know, I should turn in my Merry Marvel Marching Society membership.Sigh. It’s not that I didn’t want to see it - I did - but I just didn’t get around to it and then it was “may as well wait until video” time. Ah well, now I’ve seen it, finally.
In fact, I’ve seen it twice - that’s how much I liked it, I watched it twice in two days. I liked it more than Dark Knight. More than any other super-hero movie since Spider-Man 2, actually. I thought it was just great. First off, let’s start with the cast. Robert Downey Jr. was perfectly cast as Tony Stark/Iron Man. You just can’t say enough about his portrayal of the millionaire industrialist who undergoes a life-changing experience - it was spot-on. Gwyneth Paltrow, who I normall don’t care for, was also great in a totally understated role as Pepper Potts. Terrence Howard was also quite good, if underused, as Rhodey (more on this in a minute). Finally, Jeff Bridges as Obadiah Stane, was, to be honest, one of the best comic-book movie villains in recent memory. No, not as good as the Joker, I’ll admit that. But you have to agree that most times, the bad guys in super-hero movies tend to ham it up and snarl and try to look evil and generally come across as campy, even when there are good actors behind the roles (like, say, all of the villains in the Spider-Man series except Doc Ock). Sure, he had a couple of bad one-liners, but overall, he plays the role with just the right amount of flair and seriousness. And he looked great with the shaved head and beard! (Story-wise, Stane falls into that whole “suspend your disbelief that one second, he’s a middle-aged businessman, and the next second he’s a super-villain capable of taking down the hero” problem that, again, all super-hero movie villains seem to share. How come we got a half-dozen scenes of Tony stuggling to learn to use the armor - that he designed! - but Stane knows how to use it as soon as he straps it on? Can’t fault Bridges for that though). The movie was incredibly well-paced. I’m not a fan of this idea that Hollywood seems to think all movies are OK at 2.5 hours or more now. SOME movies are. Not all. Iron Man would be one that would NOT be good at any more than two hours - it was pitch-perfect as is. It starts off with a bang, gives you the origin, a nice action sequence, and sprinkles in some good character stuff before everything hits the fan with the big climax. I do wish there had been a little more screen-time for Stark and Rhodey - as I say, Terrence Howard was underused - but I understand that any more character stuff would have slowed it down too much. It’s a shame, especially since it now looks like Howard is out of the sequel, that we’ll never see that develop. The visual effects were also very well done. Iron Man looked fantastic, but not out of this world - too often in the comics he either looks like a guy in a regular old costume (as opposed to a suit of armor) or a robot. But he really looked like a guy in an armored suit. There were a couple moments where he and the Iron Monger suit probably moved a little too fast considering their size and weight, but hey, it’s still a comic book movie. Anyway, overall, great comic book movie. I admit I’m surprised - when I heard Marvel was taking over backing their own films, I thought it was a mistake, that they wouldn’t have the money or clout to make the films the way they should be made. I was wrong, obviously, since both this movie and the Hulk were well-budgeted and had good casts. Good for them, and I hope to see many more down the line! Naturally, watching Iron Man got me thinking about the character quite a bit. I was a pretty big Iron Man fan back in the day, collecting his adventures from the late 80s through early 90s, and filling in many back issues.
I think that it’s a monumentally important story and one that had to be told. Some great Iron Man stories flowed from this, and in addition, it was one of the first steps in comic books moving out of the “kid stuff” genre to being considered acceptable forms of art, literature and entertainment. I do think it’s a little overrated; it is still stuck in the 1970s style of writing, with characters making speeches at each other instead of talking, a few cheap thrills and over-the-top shenanigans. (I love this: Bethany says to Iron Man, “you’re a terrible bodyguard,” and he says, “but how would you know… unless…” “That’s right,” she says, “I’m a bodyguard too!” Sigh.) I’m not slagging David Michelinie’s writing - that’s just the way comics were done back then. Art-wise, John Romita Jr’s work is good, but he’s still starting out in his career with a lot of room for improvement. Bob Layton is the inker, and co-plotter (he and Michelinie are generally considered the best Iron Man creators), and his inks always looked good no matter who was penciling.
However, as I say, it does lead to some great stories down the line. First up, the underrated “second drunk Iron Man story,” which runs a good 30 issues, when Stark gets so boozed up he quits being Iron Man, loses control of his company for good, and actually ends up a bum in the street. It’s definitely not as “important” a story as the original Demon in a Bottle, but I think it’s good nonetheless, and it’s generally forgotten. Written by Dennis O’Neil and drawn my Luke McDonnell, the story does lose focus and drag in parts - it’s not as tightly plotted as the “arc-driven” stories we see today. But at least that meant you never knew what was going to happen next or how long the story would last! What’s most important is that we really, really see the effects of alcoholism, no holds barred, and it doesn’t wrap up neatly in one issue. Issue #182, where Tony finally hits rock bottom, is one of the best Iron Man comics ever. We also see someone else in the armor for the first time; see Tony actually use his brain and business acumen to rebuild his life and career from the bottom up; and hey, some great super-hero action to boot. O’Neil’s writing is solid as always, and McDonnell’s art is… well, it’s definitely a bit of a different take on Iron Man. You know, it’s funny, at times, it’s dynamic and tight; other times, it looks like he may be rushing, perspectives seem off, faces seem “mushy”… basically it runs the gamut from “pretty good” to “pretty bad.” McDonnell leaves before the end, and after a couple of fill-ins, new regular artist Mark Bright takes over in issue #200 - when it all comes to a head. Seriously, this is a classic Iron Man comic, when Stane dons his Iron Monger armor, Stark dons his red-and-silver armor (my favourite!) and they duke it out for all the marbles. But in the end, all doesn’t end up happy, as Stark still doesn’t have his old company, his new company gets destroyed, and he loses his close friend Morley Erwin. Bright is one of my favourite Iron Man artists; while his work on “regular” faces always left a little to be desired, I thought he drew a fantastic Iron Man. As I said, it’s probably not as good as the original Demon in a Bottle, but it’s a worthy companion piece to it. The next story that I think deserves credit is the so-called Armor Wars story from issue #’s 225-232. It’s probably the second-most famous Iron Man story, and I don’t think it would have happened without “Demon in a Bottle” story.
The story is written by Michelinie, co-plotted and inked again by Layton, and penciled by Bright. Tony’s obsessive, addictive personality is clearly something they instilled in the character. This story is a rip-roaring ride, filled with action, intrigue, betrayals, guest stars, and more action. Tony makes a whole bunch of enemies, the red-and-silver armor gets destroyed (boo on that, but what a great finale!) and a new red-and-gold suit emerges. It works so well, I think, because it combines all the elements of Iron Man in one story - there’s super-hero action, there’s Tony’s obsessive personality, there’s corporate intrigue, there’s government weapons manufacturing issues, there’s Tony doing the James Bond “create a gadget” thing, there’s different armors… it’s all there and it’s all good. And to top it all off, you get a wicked “epilogue” issue, drawn by Barry Windsor-Smith, in which Tony has a nightmare about everything he’s done recently. Words can’t do it justice, it’s just creepy and weird and totally BWS… and it’s awesome. For my money, Armor Wars is the best Iron Man story ever. It’s better than “Demon in a Bottle” - Michelinie’s writing has firmly graduated into the 1980s, and Bright and Layton’s art is some of the best ever to grace the title. It’s better than the Rhodey-takes-over Iron Man issues - much more tightly plotted and focused, better dialogue, better art. If you want a good Iron Man story, find this in paperback and give it a read - you won’t be disappointed. So those are my quick-hit Iron Man recommendations. Yes, Demon in a Bottle is the most famous Iron Man story, and it’s good, but I think the Rhodey-as-Iron Man stories from Iron Man #’s 168-200 are also a worthy read, and I think Armor Wars is the best of the bunch.
Aug
21
2008
Biggs… Biggs!?Posted by: Josh in General NBA, General Raptors, General Sports, Movies, Music, Star Wars, Video GamesWell, we’re back. Once again we’re going to try this blog thing. How many times is this? Five? Eight? I’ve lost count.As usual, we’ll mainly be focusing on the Raptors with commentary on a few other things like movies, music, video games, comic books and other nerdy things like Magic and Star Wars thrown in here and there. Some quick notes to get us back in the swing of things: Jermaine O’Neal I’m not a huge Jermaine O’Neal fan, never have been; always thought he was a bit overrated. But I am a fan of this deal. Look, anytime you can trade an injury-prone 5′11″ guard for an injury-prone, 6′11″ forward-center, you have to make that deal. Especially if you’ve already got a replacement for the guard (and he doesn’t want to play backup here) and the forward-center is a former five-time all-star. Hey, it might not work at all - it’s possible that Chris Bosh and O’Neal may not be able to play together, that O’Neal might get hurt, that Jose Calderon may not be as good a starter as we think, that Andrea Bargnani may continue to stink and that Sam Mitchell won’t be able to figure out how to get the best three-point shooter in the game open for more than 0.7 seconds per game. All these things and more are possible. But, coming off a disappointing season in which rebounding and defense were the team’s biggest problems, getting Jermaine O’Neal is a risk worth taking. I think as long as he stays healthy, and as long as Mitchell decides on a rotation and doesn’t jerk the 2-3 positions around as much as he did last year, the team should win 45 games and be in the hunt in the middle of the east. Team USA First off, at this point, if you think there’s a chance the US won’t win the gold… you’re crazy. Look, like a lot of people, I had doubts about this team coming into the Olympics. But I watched that first game against China, and there was no doubt after that. Zero. None. It wasn’t just the talent level - the US, even when it wasn’t winning tournaments, was always the most talented and athletic team. No, this time, it was the execution - they made all the right adjustments on defense, they moved the ball well on offense… they ran when the opportunities came, they didn’t force things… basically, they played like a real team. A well-coached team. And that was the complaint about them the past few tournaments, right, they didn’t play like a team? And all the other countries did? Now that the US is playing together, playing the right way, no other team is close to them. Australia didn’t have a chance, and neither does Spain or Argentina. I’m also, obviously, pleased with how well Bosh is playing. Especially his effort on defence. With O’Neal beside him, hopefully Bosh won’t take as much of a pounding and be forced to guard the rim as much - he’ll be able to use the quickness he’s showing in Beijing to help the perimeter guys a bit, leaving O’Neal as the last line of defense. Also, for those that like to debate these things… this team would not beat the original (and one-and-only) Dream Team. That is the greatest basketball team ever assembled. I would say that, if those two teams played 10 times, the current team would MAYBE win one, but the Dream Team would win the other nine. Easily. XBox 360 My beloved XBox 360 Elite succumbed to the dreaded Red Ring of Death recently. Thankfully, it was still covered by Microsoft’s extended “we’re losing billions on this, but WTF, we got the marketshare” three-year warranty. The service was fairly efficient, the only hiccup being Purolator A) making me drive to the Beaches to pick up my empty box; and B) claiming to have attempted to deliver my replacement this past Monday, even though no one ever rang my door. Whatever, it arrived Tuesday, and I’m back gaming after a month long vacation. So the question is how to prevent the RRoD from happening again. The most rumoured cause of the RRoD is overheating; my XBox was in my entertainment unit, and although I believed there was enough airflow around it, perhaps there wasn’t. Or there was just enough to keep its lifespan at 14 months. So now I either have to find a new place for it (not easy) or buy a new, more open-concept entertainment unit (not cheap). Or perhaps suspend it on a wire from the ceiling with a fan blowing on it at all times…. Sigh. I’ll have to figure something out this weekend. As for what I’m playing, well, I still have a few achievements left to capture for Lego Star Wars, and after that, I think I may play some Guitar Hero or Rock Band - I haven’t rocked out in far too long. I do need to pick up Civilization: Revolution at some point, and of course, The Force Unleashed comes out next month… And for the record, I did not finish Grand Theft Auto IV. I could not beat the last mission. I’m not kidding. Final mission, I got stuck. Damn frustrating. Music Saw Counting Crows the other night, my favourite band of course. I am happy to report that even though they are old and haven’t done much of anything lately, they are still great live. The show was a nice acoustic set (although that version of Miami was a little TOO acoustic). Even though it was yet another in their seemingly endless string of co-headlining summer tours at shitty outdoor venues, and Maroon 5 was predictably terrible, I’m glad I went, as it could be the last time I see them; they’ve been so quiet, I wouldn’t be surprised if they quit any day now. Of course at this point I’d pay just about anything to hear them indoors, at a nice venue, on their own for a full show. Massey Hall, anyone? The Dark Knight Dark Knight was not as good as the hype. Was it good? Yes. Was it THAT good? Not even close. Whose idea was it to shoe-horn the Harvey Dent story into this flick? HUGE mistake in not giving his transformation into Two-Face the time it deserves, and making him a secondary character in what should have been the Joker’s movie. The flick should have ended after the hospital confrontation, leaving Dent to descend into madness and take his revenge in the next flick. Mashing it all together did each villain (and Batman, who seemed to barely be on-screen) a disservice, and made the film way too long. The acting, outside one notable exception, was fantastic. Enough has been said about Heath Ledger, of course, and Aaron Eckhardt made a great Harvey Dent. And would probably have made a good Two-Face, if, you know… That exception? Maggie Gyllenhall. She’s not a bad actress, but she was practically unwatchable here. Look, can we please just get away from giving Batman a romantic foil? Please. Just take a look at your source material. Give me one good Batman comic with Bruce Wayne in love. Oh, look. There are none. Shocking. Her death may have sent Harvey over the edge, but did the audience really care? An utterly forgettable role Anyway. It was still an enjoyable film even if it was 40 minutes too long. And obviously, I’m glad it’s doing well as it is; any superhero film making a ton of cash is good news for comic book fans, and a comic film that dark and “grown up” means that perhaps audiences really are ready to take the next step with… Watchmen Does it look cool? Hell yeah. Is it going to be good? Probably. Great? No way. Look, Watchmen is the best comic book ever made, but it’s great because it does things no other comic book ever did before, and none have done as well since. None of these things will translate to film. The story itself will translate fine, and the characters - if the acting and writing is any good - should also be solid on screen. Top it off with some nice effects and yeah, it should be a decent flick. But I can imagine the universal reaction afterwards being, “that was good, but I really don’t see what makes that any better than any other comic book…” because the things that make a great comic book won’t be there: The symmetry in the panels. The subtle unraveling of history that just can’t happen in a two or even three hour film. The depth of the illustrations. The recurring motifs that you only notice after reading it three times. That perfect balance of art and writing. Look, Citizen Kane is the greatest movie ever made, but you wouldn’t turn Citizen Kane into a comic book and expect it to have the same impact. Take away all the groundbreaking camera work, lighting, acting, innovative flashback structure, and editing - none of which had ever been done before in a movie… and you’re left with a biography of a rich guy. So if you turn the Citizen Kane of comic books into a movie… removing all the things that make it a great comic… you’re left with a story of how super-heroes ended the cold war… … …which, on second thought… actually does sound pretty cool. Star Wars Revisited A Star Wars fan? Good. Google “Star Wars Revisited Adywan”. Just do it, just like that. I’ll wait. … OK, so now you know that Star Wars Revisited is one person’s masterpiece - a version of Star Wars edited to get rid of all the special edition nonsense, while keeping the good parts of it, and adding in a couple very subtle touches to tie the movie to its prequels. It’s also colour- and sound-corrected from the incredibly flawed 2004 DVD release. Basically, it’s the greatest version of Star Wars ever made. Find some way, anyway, to get your hands on it, watch it, and remember why you fell in love with it 30-odd years ago. And hope you can find some way to “speed up the harvest” so that Adywan finishes up The Empire Strikes Back Revisited soon! Tags: Chris Bosh, Counting Crows, Dark Knight, Jermaine O'Neal, Raptors, Star Wars Revisited, Team USA, Watchmen, XBox 360 |

The most famous Iron Man story is of course, the “Demon in a Bottle” story that culminates in Iron Man #128 (it’s available as a trade by the same name, or as “The Power of Iron Man.”) Over the course of the previous issues, Tony is seen drinking a little too much, and it all comes to a head when he yells at Jarvis (who was just doing his job), stands Bethany up on a date (because he was too drunk to remember the address) and cracks a container of chlorine gas causing a mass evacuation (because he couldn’t handle the armor correctly in his state). In the end, he overcomes the pressure to drink again but loses control of the Stark Industries to SHIELD (temporarily).
Anyway the point I’m trying to make, is that “Demon in a Bottle” is a good story, and very important for its time - but it’s a little dated now, and doesn’t really stand the “test of time” that many other great 1980s comics do.
Tony doesn’t drink here, but an obsessive, compulsive - almost addictive - reaction to what happens around him is clearly cut from the same vein as his alcoholism. In this story, Tony discovers that someone has stolen some of his armor designs, and goes on a quest, or vendetta if you will, against anyone using it. He seems willing to go to any lengths necessary to secure his designs, to make sure no one else is using it to hurt anyone.
Entries (RSS)